EXCLUSIVE SCOOP!
HITLER IS ALIVE!
Officially Adolf Hitler and his mistress Eva Braun, were reported to have taken their departure from life in a double suicide pact. The bodies, placed in a ditch filled with gasoline, were supposedly burned in the courtyard of the Reichschancellery.
In this Special Collector's Edition the "Police Gazette" reprints the original sensational findings of an investigation made throughout Europe and South America by competent investigators in 1951-1954 into the strange mystery of Adolf Hitler's alleged death. This world-wide investigation unearthed amazing revelations.
This world-wide investigation unearthed amazing revelations to displace this theory. Former heads of the Wehrmacht, who are spread all over the world, and certain Nazis, still being sought, were interviewed. The extensive inquiry reached into the far corners of the world.
So sensational and world-shaking are the results of this probe that the "Police Gazette" felt obligated to present all the data to its readers in a series of exclusive articles:.
When news of the probe reached Lieutenant Heinz Schäffer, former commander of the German Submarine U-977, he came voluntarily from Argentina, where he now lives, to the Paris office of the investigators. He was the commander who surrendered to Argentine authorities at Mar del Plata on 17 August 1945, after having spent three and a half months on a mysterious sea voyage.
The German naval officer denied spiriting Hitler away, but could not or would not explain his long and mysterious submarine voyage at war's end. Nor would he disclose the unexplained luxury condition of one U-Boat.
Lieutenant Commander Schäffer made the following statement which, incidentally, in no way invalidates the findings which will be presented in these articles.
"It has been claimed that I carried Adolf Hitler, Eva Braun and Martin Bormann aboard my submarine. That is untrue. Also, I was subjected to lengthy interrogations on this point by the American and British authorities. Finally, the latter accepted my explanations and freed me and my crew.
"The truth is that I went to Mar del Plata, like the U-530 which preceded us, in order to escape internment.
"At the time I received command of the U-977, in April 1945, the Russians were approaching Berlin and the Americans already had occupied most of the French ports. My superiors ordered me to Norway. I arrived there the day Admiral Dönitz took over as head of the German Reich. On 2 May we received orders to surface, hoist the white flag, return to our bases and wait there for the Allies.
"I told my crew that we had two possibilities:
(1) to scuttle our submarine in the Channel, make for the English coast in our lifeboats and surrender;
(2) make for a country which had remained friendly to Germany.
"Since I had friends in Argentina, I suggested that country which was approved by the crew. Sixteen of the men who were married preferred to return. I put them ashore on the Norwegian coast and then turned the bow of my vessel towards South America".
We asked Commander Schäffer at this point: "Did you have sufficient provisions for such a long voyage?"
He said, "Yes, only a few days earlier we had taken aboard cases of canned foods at a depot in Denmark".
A lucky coincidence, indeed.
Heinz Schäffer then went on:
"I knew that the ocean was patrolled by American planes. For that reason I decided to travel submersed. Our boat was equipped with Schnorchel which enabled us to travel under the surface by using our Diesels.
"We could have lightened our boat by shedding our torpedos. However, I held on to them. I was afraid we might be charged with having sunk ships after the armistice.
"We traveled submersed for sixty-six days. Sixty-six days of superhuman suffering.
"My crew of 31 sailors took turns in falling sick.
"By the time we had left the danger zone they had been reduced to human debris.
"We surfaced in the vicinity of the Cape Verde Islands.
"From there on the voyage was pleasant and on 17 August we entered the Port of Mar del Plata".
Nobody maintains that Hitler was aboard the U-977. Our staff investigator also established that fact. However, as we shall see very soon, the U-977 as well as the U-530 were stated to play different roles than that of transport vessels.
The statement of Commander Heinz Schäffer fails to shed light on several points on which we vainly tried to get satisfactory explanations.
For instance, is it plausible for a captain to condemn his crew to two months of superhuman suffering merely to escape captivity?
On the other hand, the U-977 left Norway 2 May and arrived around 8 July in the vicinity of the Cape Verde Islands. Why did the vessel take two and a half months to reach Argentina? We stress these baffling details, because in the course of the series of articles which starts in this issue, the staff of investigators will present a proper explanation.
Surrender by the U-530
"Hello," an excited voice came over the phone. "This is the 'United Press'. A German submarine has just surrendered to Argentine Naval authorities in the port of Mar del Plata".
This conversation took place 10 July 1945. The capitulation of the Reich already was history and the three Great Powers were making last-minute preparations for their meeting at Potsdam. Thus it was no wonder that this unexpected news created a sensation not only in Buenos Aires, but also in London and Washington.
Subsequent stories confirmed that first piece of news and around noontime an official communique of the Navy Ministry announced the vessel in question was the German submarine U-530.
The commander's papers identified him as Captain Otto Wermuth. He was the last to leave his boat. On shore he handed over a small valise containing the flag of the submarine as well as the ship's papers. His youth created general attention. It was later learned that he was only 25 years of age. His second in command, Captain Karl Felix Schuller, was still younger, only 22. Both officers and enlisted men seemed unusually young, some of them mere children.
The crew of the U-530 appeared tired, but not undernourished. The first officials who came aboard established that the boat's entire complement of 54 men still had a rather large store of food, despite their long voyage. In turn, a surprisingly small amount of fuel was found on board the submarine. Incidentally, at the moment of surrender the vessel was partially disarmed. It lacked the forward [bow] cannon as well as two large-caliber anti-aircraft guns. These it was supposed, had been dumped overboard when the captain had decided to surrender. On the other hand, the hull of the submarine was partially denuded of paint and generally covered with dirt, sure signs of an extended voyage on the high seas.
No important Nazi bigwig arrived on the U-530, the Buenos Aires evening papers announced in large headlines, thus furnishing a clear answer to the question asked by all. Meanwhile, another question raised was whether the U-530 was responsible for the sinking of the Brazilian cruiser 'Bahia', whose survivors arrived that same morning at the port of Recife. On the other hand, rumors were heard everywhere to the effect that some of the Nazi Chieftains had landed on the coast of Patagonia. These landings, it was alleged, had been made by means of rubber boats in the region of Necochea.
Four and a Half Months at Sea
The next day, the mystery was cleared up by a second communique issued by the Navy Ministry which stated as follows:
(1) Investigations established that the German submarine which surrendered to the authorities of the Mar del Plata base was not responsible for the sinking of the Brazilian cruiser 'Bahia'.
(2) No German political or military leaders were on board the aforementioned submarine.
(3) Prior to having surrendered to the authorities, the submarine did not disembark anybody along the Argentine coast.
(4) All persons who did come ashore were members of the crew of the submarine, in accordance with the official register submitted.
At Mar del Plata the arrival of the German submarine created unusual excitement.
Following inspection visits by the Naval Attachés of Great Britain and the United States, it was learned that in accordance with information furnished by the Captain the U-530 had left Germany on 19 February 1945 and sailed northward to Norway. From there it left on 13 March in the direction of the North Atlantic. When the surrender order issued by Admiral Dönitz became known on board, Captain Wermuth decided to continue his voyage to the coast of Argentina and surrender at Mar del Plata.
These statements, together with additional information concerning the person of Captain Wermuth and his career as submarine commander were soon published by the papers. Yet, there was the fact that the U-530 had traveled on the high seas for almost four and a half months.
This fact, in itself, could not fail to attract considerable attention. The modern German submarines like the U-530 which had been constructed in 1942 were equipped with completely new devices which enabled them to cruise for months on end far away from their bases.
They were Schnorchel-equipped, the Schnorchel being a respiratory device which made it possible for the submarine to stay submersed and travel under water for 70 consecutive days. Thus, it was not the fact of the prolonged voyage on the high-seas which attracted so much attention, but the question which logically followed, namely:
What had been the activities of the U-530 during those four and a half months, from the day it had left its base to the day of its surrender at Mar del Plata?
This question was asked not only at Buenos Aires but also in London. There the news of the submarine's surrender created consternation at the Admiralty, whose spokesman had only recently stated that the seas of the globe could again be traversed in absolute safety. When no official communique was forthcoming in the British capital, a naval commentator did not hesitate to speak of "an ocean mystery which is open to numerous conjectures". One month before it had been assumed that the last German submarine had been accounted for. Then, on 3 June, one of these vessels was disarmed by its crew off the northern coast of Portugal.
The news of the surrender of the U-530 created in London the effect of a bombshell and promptly provoked lively disputes in naval circles, where the presence of a German submarine in Argentine waters was explained by one of two theories:
(1) Under orders of its fanatical commander, the submarine had continued to carry on the war on its own account as long as possible, without heeding the orders issued by Dönitz.
(2) The submarine had been selected for the secret transport of a high Nazi personage to Argentina with the hope of finding refuge there.
Soon it became evident that both theories were ill founded. Few facts were known concerning the political convictions of Commander Wermuth. However, inspections of the technical installations on board the vessel showed beyond doubt that the U-530 not only had not sunk the 'Bahia', but had in fact not engaged in any warlike action during the last phase of its voyage, that is, at least not since the day when the capitulation order had been issued.
With regard to the second theory, the official Argentine statement was absolutely clear: it was based on the result of inquiries carried out in the most conscientious manner. Yet, one question remained unanswered: What had the U-530 been doing during its long voyage and why had it come to Argentina to surrender?
There seemed to be no satisfactory answer to this question nor to several others that cropped up in that connection. The crew of the submarine underwent repeated questioning, with no result. Their statements agreed perfectly with the documents produced and with the stories of their officers. Their replies were perfectly co-ordinated, as if they had been carefully rehearsed or, and there is always that possibility, as if they actually embodied the truth.
Nevertheless, three days after the arrival of the U-530 at Mar del Plata only a handful of people believed in the declarations of Captain Wermuth and his crew. For in these uniform recitals there were several obscure points which yet required explanation. Without going into any lengthy investigation, there was the obvious fact that the submarine could not possibly have undertaken the long and dangerous voyage from Norway to Mar del Plata for no other reason than to arrive on the hospitable shores of Argentina, to quote the Captain of the vessel.
The Mystery Cigarettes
Certain details continued to arouse the public interest. The U-530 was of limited tonnage. Its normal complement could not have exceeded 27 men. Since the second year of the war, German submarines of the U-530 type used to carry no more than 18 and sometimes only 16 men, in view of the lack of manpower which permanently beset the Reich submarine arm. Why, then, did the U-530 at the time of its surrender carry three times the complement of the war years?
Why did Captain Wermuth's vessel carry 54 men aboard? Why was the majority of the crew so surprisingly young?
Experts who inspected the vessel were able to establish that the supplies on board were rather ample even for such a large crew. They also found that the ship carried only an insignificant number of torpedoes and other munitions. In all probability, the war materiel had been reduced in quantity so as to gain space for such a large crew as well as for the necessary food supplies.
Another mystery which balked satisfactory clarification: one compartment of the submarine yielded a rather large quantity of cigarettes. The naval inspectors were surprised to find such a large stock of cigarettes on board the U-530. And without doubt they raised eyebrows when Captain Wermuth told them that on his arrival he still had 10 cartons of cigarettes per man aboard. As a result, there were found 540 cartons of cigarettes on board and maybe more.
Imagine the surprise of naval technicians in view of the fact that no smoking is permitted in the interior of a submarine.
As a rule, submarine crews don't smoke and the Germans are no exception to that. And this abstinence became quite evident during the internment of the U-530 crew near Mar del Plata at a summer camp, which happened to be vacant: they didn't smoke, even though they had disembarked.
All these facts indicated that the U-530 was truly an unusual submarine. It carried a large complement, plenty of food supplies, a large store of cigarettes and little war materiel. It had not conformed to the capitulation orders and it had undertaken such a long and perilous voyage for the sole purpose of surrendering to the Argentine port authorities.
Truly, this story smelled phony. On the other hand, the truth failed to be unearthed. Officers and men of the U-530 continued to repeat their initial statements with the precision of a phonograph record and without any contradictions. Yet, the naval authorities dared not be satisfied with these well-tailored stories.
And so, on the morning of 13 July, the Argentine flag was hoisted on the conning tower of the German submarine and Argentine war vessels and planes left the Mar del Plata base to search the coastal waters for other German naval unit.
A Phony Captain?
That search yielded no positive results. Investigations were also undertaken throughout the Necochea region where several persons insisted they had observed the landing of a rubber lifeboat several days prior to the surrender of the submarine. A new crop of rumors sprang up but soon subsided. Yet some people persisted that Captain Wermuth was not the real captain of the submarine.
The most persistent rumors concerned alleged landings of Nazi bigwigs on the coast of Patagonia. True, in view of the enormous length of the Argentine coastline, the U-530 could have carried out shore landings by means of rubber lifeboats. However, the results of the investigations did not support such theories by a single shred of evidence. During the period which has elapsed since, all conjectures of this sort have been thoroughly demolished. It is safe to state that beyond any reasonable doubt, no person was put ashore along the Argentine coast by the U-530.
If such conjectures had proved well founded, it would have undoubtedly caused new investigations and certainly would have resulted in official steps on the part of the United States and Great Britain with the Argentine Government.
On 14 July 1945 a naval commentator declared: "The truth concerning the U-530 will be found only in the German naval archives". He is probably right.
It is not known whether the Allies succeeded in getting hold of the pertinent Reich Naval records and whether those records explained the nature of the last mission of the submarine seized at Mar del Plata. News dispatches announced that the American and British Governments would hold consultations on the case of the U-530 on the basis of reports from their respective naval attaches at Buenos Aires.
But a few weeks later it was learned that the submarine which had surrendered at Mar del Plata actually was not the real U-530 at all.
Several days later, on 19 July 1945 Admiral Eberhardt God, Commander in Chief of Submarine Operations issued this statement at Kiel, Germany:
"The U-530 did not leave Germany on 19 February 1945. As a matter of fact, the boat was still at Kiel on 3 March. On that date it left Kiel for Norway".
This statement by Admiral Godt later confirmed by Helmuth Heye, former Commander of the German Battle Cruiser 'Admiral Hipper' and ex-Chief of Small Combat units, which included mini-submarines, combat divers, etc., squarely contradicted the stories told by Capt. Otto Wermuth, Commandant of the U-530, to the Argentine authorities.
Did Wermuth Lie?
Wermuth's tale was contradicted even more strongly by another German naval officer, Capt. Kurt Langer who until the middle of 1944 had been in command of the U-530.
In an interview with newspapermen, Langer stated that the U-530 actually leaked water at the seams and could no longer be considered seaworthy.
In fact, he went on, the U-530 was an unlucky submarine:
"Its stern had been smashed by an American tanker on Christmas Day of 1943 when I was attacked on the eastern shore of the Panama Canal. It was a sheer miracle that I managed to get back to my base".
"It seems unbelievable to me that such an old and worn ship could have made the trip to the Argentine Coast.
"If Hitler and Eva Braun escaped from Germany aboard a submarine," he concluded, "they hardly could have made this voyage aboard the U-530".
But the U-530 which surrendered at Mar del Plata, was not at all an old and worn ship which leaked water through its seams. As a matter of fact, it was a recently designed, completely new boat and in excellent condition to have made the long journey across the Atlantic. Thus, all evidence points to the fact that the U-530 which surrendered at Mar del Plata was not the same submarine of which Captain Langer spoke. In other words, the ship at Mar del Plata was a different unit, though of the same class as the original U-530. Somewhere along the line, a switch had been made and a new ship had been substituted for the old U-530.
What reason was there for this switch?
Obviously, it was to confound any subsequent investigations. What actually seemed to have happened was this: while the real U-530, that "old and worn ship", was being overhauled at Kiel for departure scheduled on 3 March, its double had left Germany as early as 19 February to carry out the mission entrusted to it. It is entirely feasible that this switch was carried out in a secrecy which tricked even Admiral Godt and Captain Heye, especially since the secret orders heretofore seem to have come from the Supreme Army Command of the Reichwehr.
Thus, all German naval officers quoted previously may have spoken the truth. Commandant Wermuth may have been sincerely convinced that his boat was the real U-530. And Captain Langer and Admirals Godt and Captain Heye also may have been entirely sincere when they asserted that the real U-530 was on 19 February still at Kiel.
Did the Allies ever succeed in proving a switch? This is a moot question, since no statement on this subject was ever published.
Nevertheless, the British Admiralty must have entertained suspicions as to the real state of affairs. On 18 July 1945 its spokesman told the press in London that "no official calculation has been undertaken as to the number of remaining German submarines". At about the same time a London naval commentator freely admitted "With respect to the German submarine problem even the Admiral's secret Intelligence branch despite the information available, is unable to express itself with absolute certainty".
Strange Events
With the U-530 and its crew interned at Mar del Plata, the Argentine Naval Authorities decided on 17 July 1945 to place that sub at the disposal of the United States and Great Britain. That same day, news was received in Buenos Aires of strange observations made by inhabitants of the village of San Clements del Toyo, situated to the north of Mar del Plata.
These villagers claimed to have seem the shape of another German submarine silhouetted against the horizon far out at sea. A few of the observers even claimed to have spotted two subs and that one of them appeared to have run aground not far from the shore.
Upon receipt of this news the Argentine Navy Ministry dispatched several airplane squadrons and various ships to the scene. But despite intensive searching no submarines were spotted. As a matter of fact, weather conditions in the warmth of a thick fog hampered the search considerably which rendered the job of the combined naval and air units so difficult that it was soon broken off. Yet, an extensive area was covered.
Also, numerous beach patrols were organized immediately along the coast in order to prevent any landing attempts. Simultaneously, Argentina's Federal Police launched several investigations among the country's German colonies.
The net results were zero.
No submarines were sighted and no landings were discovered along the coast.
A week later, on 24 July, the US Government at Washington announced it had dispatched army planes to Mar del Plata in order to bring the crew of the U-530 to the US The same communique added that the U-530 would be towed to an American port.
The news was bound to create a sensation. Though the war had ended three months earlier, the US seemed in great haste to intern within its borders the crew of the U-530. This contrasted with the leisurely manner in which the crew of the 'Admiral Graft Spee' had been carried off at the height of the war.
Suffice it to say that no official statements were ever issued concerning the interrogations of the crew of the U-530 by the US authorities. Rumors had it that both officers and men were subjected an intensive questioning. But the results still remain to be aired.
Appearance of the U-977
A little over a month after the surrender of the U-530, on 17 August 1945 the Argentine Naval Ministry issued to the press two communiques.
"Today, at 9:20 a.m., the first communique, from a German submarine, seemingly of the type of the U-530, surrendered to Argentine Naval units on patrol off Mar del Plata. The aforementioned submarine entered Mar del Plata at 11:15 towed by the Dredge M10 and escorted by a submarine of the country's Navy. Thereupon the crew was taken ashore. At present, a security watch is being stationed on board".
The second communique added:
"The German submarine now lying at anchor in the port of Mar del Plata is the U-977 of 600 tons. Its crew is made up of 32 men, including four officers. The boat was commanded by Lt. Commander Heinz Schäffer who at present is aboard the 'S.S. Belgrano'.
During the next 48 hours it was revealed that the U-977 had been spotted approximately eight miles east of the port of Mar del Plata. It was sighted by Argentine Naval Units on patrol in this area as well as by a local fishing boat. The 'S.S. Commodore Py' and other vessels approached the sub and ascertained that it was German. Thereupon the sub's commander indicated his readiness to surrender. The ship was then escorted to the base where officers and enlisted men were immediately interned and subjected to preliminary questioning".
Important contrasts were observed between the new arrival and the U-530 which had surrendered over a month earlier.
The U-977, seemingly of the latest design and equipped with the latest type of navigating and other instruments, was not disarmed. It even possessed equipment in the form of a chemical substances which, when released into the water, would stay submerged and there create subsurface bubbles so as to lend the impression that the submarine had sunk.
Concerning the itinerary of the U-977 as recorded in the ship's log book, the Argentine Naval Ministry on the eve of 18 August issued the following communique:
"Documents found aboard the German U-boat U-977 seem to indicate that the ship left Kiel on 13 April, made Oslo and left there on 22 April, then touched Christiansund and left there on 2 May. On the Norwegian Coast it disembarked 16 men, all noncommissioned officers, who were married and had families in Germany. Next the ship traversed the blockaded zone of the Atlantic by slipping through the Faroe Islands and Iceland. From there it traveled a southerly course, passed to the west of the Charies and in between the Cape Verde Islands. Thereafter it surfaced, passed near the cliffs of San Pablo, then followed the Brazilian coast, but out of sight from the latter and at an average distance of 180 miles, and made for Mar del Plata".
From the above communique it would appear that the U-977 had been on the high seas for more than three and a half months, without engaging in any belligerent act, just like the U-530.
Now Commandant Schäffer of the U-977 stated that he had no personal acquaintance of Capt. Otto Wermuth of the U-530 and his officers.
But he did admit that he knew about the surrender of the U-530 to the Argentine naval authorities at Mar del Plata. This news had been received by the radio on board the U-977.
Now arises this question:
Why did Captain Schäffer and the U-977 wait five additional weeks before following the example of the U-530 in surrendering at Mar del Plata?
The rest of the story of the U-977 is comparatively uneventful. The crew was taken to Garcia Island and from there transferred by planes to the US As in the case of the U-530, the results of their interrogations were never published.
An Unknown Mission
Despite the official silence cloaked around these two mysterious Nazi subs, the following conclusions are self-evident:
(1) After leaving Germany, both the U-530 as well as the U-977 touched Norwegian ports, then set their course for the South Atlantic, both traveling almost identical routes.
(2) Both boats were on the high seas for approximately three and a half months, without their officers being able to account satisfactorily for their activities during that period.
(3) Both commandants failed to comply with the surrender orders issued by Admiral Dönitz. Nevertheless, they did not engage in any acts of war.
(4) No satisfactory explanations were given by either sub for their motives to surrender. Although Capt. Schäffer of the U-977 had received the news of the surrender of the U-530, he elected to remain at sea for another 5 weeks prior to surrendering HIS ship.
(5) Despite the U-977 being fully armed, both submarines apparently had been used for transport instead of combat. This is also borne out by their rather full complements and by the surprisingly large food stores on board.
(6) In both submarines, officers as well as enlisted men were young and had no families.
(7) The ship headed by Commandant Wermuth obviously was not the original U-530, as seen from the statements of Admiral Godt and Capt. Langer.
(8) Actually, and we again stress the point, not only the U-530 and the U-977 were prowling the Atlantic after Dönitz' surrender orders. There was a third sub or, chronologically speaking, a first one.
As early as 4 June, 1945 it had been announced by the British Admiralty that a German submarine had appeared that day off Leixoes, Portugal. The crew, numbering 47, disarmed and scuttled their ship and then surrendered to the Portuguese authorities. Its commander stated that the ship had followed a course which later on was traveled by the U-530 and U-977, but had decided upon surrender to the Portuguese authorities because its hull and engines were badly in need of repairs.
The above seems to indicate that at the time of Germany's collapse, a number of subs had left German ports, their identity either real or faked, in order to touch first Norwegian ports of call and then to embark for the South Atlantic on missions of mystery.
Nevertheless, the mystery of these Nazi subs prowling the Atlantic even after the end of the War is bound up with the greatest mystery of all time: the survival and hiding place of Adolf Hitler, in whose death neither the highest diplomat in America nor England nor Russia believes.
As a matter of fact, the strange story of these German subs which surrendered in Argentina and Portugal starts in the underground fortresses of the Nazi Chancellery.
In the Bunker of Adolf Hitler whose criminal hand seven years earlier had set the torch of war to the world, there was hatched one of the supreme hoaxes of all times.
'I shall die defending Berlin," boasted Adolf. But the FANTASTIC EVIDENCE proves that HE LIVED!
Hitler Arranges his Fake "Death" and Cremation
On 30 April 1945 the battle for Berlin entered its last stage. The entire city was in flames and the ground trembled under salvos of 15,000 cannon with which Soviet General Zhukov had ringed Hitler's Capital. Illuminated by flickering flames, combat continued throughout the night with a ferocity seldom witnessed. At dawn the Russian flag was fluttering over the hollow, ruined shell that remained of what once had been the Reichstag, Germany's Capital.
Where was Hitler? He was said to be directing the defense of Berlin from his underground shelter below the Nazi Chancellory. But the Allies doubted this.
Nevertheless, in the early morning hours of 30 April, the "London Daily Mail" blared forth in giant headlines:
"Hitler Dying; War May Be Over Today"
This prediction was based on a piece of news received by Wilson Broadbent, diplomatic editor of the paper, who quoted a high Whitehall official as having told him: "Hitler is dying and may already be dead". The official had added that in his opinion the European war had come to an end. "The Times", generally considered the most reserved newspaper in the world, ran the following news item: "Hitler is on the brink of death as the result of a cerebral hemorrhage". The paper added that this news was based on information supposedly released by Himmler.
A Piece of Clever Staging
During the afternoon of 1 May 1945 the Hamburg Radio Station suddenly interrupted its program and began transmission of solemn Wagnerian music. After the funereal strains of "Twilight of the Gods", the announcer stated:
"Attention: In a few seconds we are going to broadcast a grave, but important message addressed to the German people. But first, the Seventh Symphony by Bruckner".
The Bruckner piece concluded, the announcer resumed:
"German men and women: Our Führer Adolf Hitler died this afternoon at his post of command in the Chancellory of the Reich, fighting to his last breath against Bolshevism".